I haven't written in a long time, so please forgive the absence.
I've noticed that people are still very vocal about their dislike, or down-right hatred, for John Cena. On one hand, I'm not mad at anyone voicing their opinion; I, for one, hate babyface Triple H - he just sucks. But, what really gets my gears about anti-Cena fans is the fact that to me, it seems as if they don't get the point. There are several reasons to why the WWE will not hear your moans, groans, and death threats; so, out of the goodness of my heart, I'm going to list a few of those reasons here.
Reason #1 - MONEY, MONEY, YEAH YEAH!Kids buy WWE merchandise. Kids' parents buy WWE merchandise. You rant on internet blogs and websites. Vince McMahon swims in money like Scrooge McDuck. Kids and kids' parents like John Cena. You like Jeff Hardy. All of this sounds unrelated and pointless, but if you take one brief moment to put two and two together, you'll see exactly why John Cena is a heavyweight champ once again. Okay, I'll slow it down for you.
The #1 complaint among anti-Cena wrestling fans is that only little kids and women like him. Well unfortunately for you, while the 18-34 male demographic brings the WWE millions of television viewers and show attendees on a weekly basis, it's those same little kids and women that dominate merchandise sales on a daily basis. For every one anti-Cena wrestling fan, there are at least 50 kids and women that are flooding WWEshop.com with purchase orders. As a matter of fact, take this on for size: Cena returned to the WWE Sunday night at Survivor Series with a brand new Cena shirt, his famous "Hustle, Loyalty, and Respect" mantra emblazoned in the same shield and colors as the old AWA logo. THE VERY NEXT NIGHT, during Cena's promo with Chris Jericho on Monday Night RAW, a child in the audience was shown holding up her sign and wearing that very same shirt. In less than twenty-four hours, at least one kid in that arena had John Cena's new merch on her back; how many grown folk between 18 - 34 had that shirt? None? Two? Eleventy? Who knows? Now how many kids had that shirt on? Countless.
As long as kids and women make up the real brunt of the buying power, McMahon will do anything to cater to them, and according to them, Cena isn't harsh on the eyes. And look at the guy: he's single, he's charming, and he's a work horse. Kids aspire to be him, and women aspire to be with him. As long as they continue to support Cena, then the champ is not going anywhere.
Reason #2 - CENA IS THE NEW HULK HOGANThe second complaint that most anti-Cena fans have is that he has a limited move-set and that he's grown stale. I'll agree with anyone on the stale part, but the limited move-set is something I'll have to disagree with you on. Please explain to me how one could hate John Cena for the 3 moves he has, when that same person can adore Ric Flair for the 2 moves he has?! Go watch a Ric Flair match right now...doesn't matter what year, just watch one...and this is what it'll consist of:
Knife-edge chop
Wooo
Back body drop (on Flair)
Wooo
Eye-poke
Wooo
Wooo
Old Man flp
Chop block
Figure-four leg lock
Submission
Wooo
Wooo
Wooo
And fans around the world consider Flair the greatest wrestler of all time. A move-set does not make a wrestler phenomenal; there are a host of other qualities a wrestler can have that can propel him into the stratosphere of the fans' hearts and wallets. Flair had all of two actual maneuvers, but he has great presence and ring psychology. His matches tell stories, and he's placed himself in compelling storylines over the years. Look at Hogan's move-set: big boot, leg drop, Hulk-Up, body slam. But yet, even in his recent douche-baggyness, he's still the first name and face you think of when you think of pro wrestling. Hogan was very marketable, and he's what the fans wanted and loved at the time. His intensity and sheer size (Hogan's a big dude) amazed fans, and that whole American thing is what people loved, not to mention his time in the NWO. If you think about it, Cena is no different from Hogan; they both constantly gave their all in between the ropes, even if fans booed them to kingdom come, without really being all that technically sound in the ring. All of this, however, goes back to reason one: their marketability sold seats and merchandise, so of course they were going to be shoved down people's throats until there were 2 more people that hated him than liked him. We have yet to get to that point.
Reason #3 - "WHO'S NEXT?"Anti-Cena fans complain that there should be someone else with the heavyweight title other than Cena, but I would dare to ask them "who fits the bill?"
Orton? Nope, he's got a storyline going with these second generation stars. Also, for some reason, Orton really hasn't wrestled much since his return. Hopefully this is due to a storyline dysfunction and not b/c of his injury.
Jericho? Nope. Chris winning the title didn't do anything for ratings, and the end of his feud with Michaels cemented Jericho's place in mediocrity. Jericho has yet to "save us" from anything, including himself. He's boring, I'm sorry. That's just how it is.
Jeff Hardy? Nope. Just ain't champion material yet...at all. I personally doubt that he ever will be. I'll save that blog for another entry.
As far as Cena being stale, I also believe it is past due time to bring fans a different side of Cena. I would prefer a heel Cena as opposed to the edgy Cena we saw on Monday Night RAW, but then again, beggars can't be chooser.
For the past few years, WWE has relied on it main workhorses to provide most of the domination during main events on their shows. But by doing so, they lacked they rub needed for younger stars to be propelled into the spotlight. The best example I can think of is with MVP. Last year, I was the only one I knew of hollerin' for MVP to be put in a program for the heavyweight belt. But, my requests fell upon deaf ears (much like this rant and your want for Cena to disappear). BUT NOW, after MVP proved his worth with that killer series with "He Who Shall Not Be Named," and esp. now that he's The Great Khali's bitch, everyone is clamoring for the guy to be put in the main event. How much more difficult would it have been for MVP to be placed into a compelling program with Triple H? Or, what if he was moved to RAW and faced CM Punk? Speaking of which, what happened to CM Punk's Heavyweight reign? The bottom line is, the WWE is siding with the people they know fans will pay to see, and ironically enough, some of the anti-Cena fans will pay to see his matches JUST to pray for him to lose. Admit it: without Cena, RAW was boring, and has been boring for the past few weeks; honestly, RAW has been boring since Cena's been out and the chaos after McMahon's Million Dollar Mania died down. They've placed the belts on people they thought could carry the strap and bring in more buys, but the only one to do that consistently in the main event has been John Cena. Did Punk do that with his reign? No. Did Jericho do that with his reign? No. Did Batista do that with his short reign? No. Can Jeff Hardy do it? No.
So there you have it. I'm not saying that anyone who dislikes Cena should jump on his coattails and ride around town, but I would like for you to put into perspective your dislike for the man. Once you realize he serves a purpose, then you'll begin to understand why he's on the forefront of every show's main event. And besides, the man got injured twice and is back wrestling again....he's a machine!